Monday, 27 January 2014

TUTORIAL 3



TUTORIAL 3 – RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARTNERS & THIRD PARTIES

ANSWER ALL PROBLEMATIC QUESTIONS BELOW
  1. Jane, June and Jinny are partners in a firm called “The New You” which specializes in beauty treatment.
Jinny, without Jane’s and June’s knowledge, borrowed RM50,000 from Sure Finance to pay off some debts of the firm and to buy a new treatment machine. Sure Finance demanded repayment of the loan from Jane and June when Jinny defaulted a few monthly installments.      
Discuss whether Sure Finance is likely to succeed in its action.

  1. Prima and De Hul are partners in a firm manufacturing CD players. While testing some CD players last month, Prima forgot to install some safety devices.
Thorens bought a CD player from the partnership and suffered hearing problems after using it. Thorens sued the firm of Prima and De Hul. De Hul denied his tortious liability on the ground that the negligence act was committed by Prima alone.
Would Thorens’ action against the firm liable?

  1. Majid and Shiraz are carrying on business as theatre proprietors. The partnership deed provided that no partner shall borrow money except with the consent of the other partner or in the usual course of business. Majid borrowed RM5,000 from Dol Chetty and used the money to go for a holiday abroad. Dol Chetty is suing the firm for the debt.
Discuss whether the firm is liable for the debt.

  1. Adam, Benjy and Cindy are partners in a firm that provides office furniture known as “My Office Enterprise”.
Adam received RM30,000 from Suriram Sdn Bhd, a client of the firm for several computer tables and filling cabinets. Without the knowledge of his co-partners, Adam misapplied the money.
Discuss the liability of the partners for the misapplication of the firm’s money.

  1. A firm of Bunga Cantik Enterprise received money from a client, Citra in the ordinary course of its business. The money was kept in the firm’s custody. Lestari, a partner of Bunga Cantik Enterprise secretly drawn the money and misapplied it. Citra sued the firm the make good the loss.
Are all partners of Bunga Cantik Enterprise liable to make good the loss?



ANSWER ALL MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS BELOW

1.       What is the liability of a new partner for partnership’s debts and obligations ?

          A.       He will liable to the old creditors
         B.       He will be liable to partnership’s debts when he is not in the partnership
         C.       He will be liable to partnership’s debts while he was a partner
D.       He will be liable to continue contracts after his admission

2.      


“Ahmad and Shahrul were partners in A & S Co, a firm which carried on a garage business.

Their partnership agreement stated that their usual scope of business would exclude the buying and selling of cars.

Ahmad, without Shahrul’s authority, sold a car to which he had no title, to Syarikat Credit Corp. for RM60,000. 

Syarikat Credit Corp. brought an action to claim back RM60,000 since Ahmad had no title to the car”




 
  


What is the legal implication as regards to the above situations?

A.       The firm was not liable as the sale of the car to Syarikat Credit Corp. 
was not an act for carrying on in the usual way of business of the kind carried on by the firm
B.       Syarikat Credit Corp. was liable as the sale of the car was not the act for carrying on in the usual way of business
C.        The firm was liable as the sale of the car to Syarikat Credit Corp. 
was an act for carrying on in the usual way of business of the kind carried on by the firm
D.       Syarikat Credit Corp. was not liable as the sale of the car was an act for carrying on in their usual way of business.




3.       When a partner committed a wrongful act under the law of tort, the firm is liable if __________.
         
A.            the wrongful act is committed without the consent of the other partners
B.            the wrongful act is committed in the ordinary course of the firm’s business
C.            the wrongful act is committed outside the scope of the partner’s usual authority
D.           the wrongful act is not ratified by the other partners

4.       What is the effect of holding out in partnership?

A.            The person who had been held out is not liable as a partner
B.            The doctrine of estoppel will be applied
C.            The person who had been held out may deny his liability in the partnership
D.           The third party cannot take legal action against the firm for the act done by the person who had been  held out

5.       The meaning of holding out can best be described as…

A.    a person who is a partner makes it known either by his word or conduct to the third party that he is not the partner.
B.    a person who is not a partner makes it known either by his word or conduct to the third party that he is the partner.
C.    a person who is a partner makes it known to the third party that he is not liable for any debts and obligations in the firm.
D.   a person is not a partner makes it known by express agreement to the third party that he would not be liable for the firm’s debts.











Please prepare  a possible solution to the following problem based on the legal principles and authorities you had learned before.

Labu, Labi and Laba are partners in a firm known as Gorgeous Enterprise. The firm manages a Shell petrol station in Putrajaya. The petrol station’s profit intake per day is very lucrative. This situation acts as an inducement for the partners to expand their business to include maintenance of cars.

Discuss the legal position of the partners in each of the following situations:

  1. In a meeting attended by Sarip, Labu told Dato’ Bakhil that Sarip is also a partner in his firm. Sarip did not say anything to Dato’ Bakhil. Dato’ Bakhil later made a loan of RM 50,000 to the firm. The money was then used by the firm in the maintenance of the business. Dato’ Bakhil then sued sarip when the firm delayed payment of the loan.



  1. Labi, in his personal capacity, was appointed as trustee for Maneesa. Labu withdrew RM 100,000 from the trust fund and used it to purchase machinery for the firm. Maneesa now sues the firm and also intends to sue Labi and Laba. 

1 comment: